The Bowler |
| 
|
selecting hair, brighten eyes
Full Sun
Side Light
Shade
Backlight
Window Light
A.Hard Light(no fill) B.Soft Light (no fill)
C.Hard light (with fill) D. Soft Light(with fill)
C.Hard light (with fill) D. Soft Light(with fill)
A B C D
1..Side Light
2..Rembrant Lighting
3.Butterfly lighting
***Hover over images to see if you can guess what type of color theory it displays!!! :D
1.Select Image.Show unprocessed raw vs. processed raw
2.Processed raw and jpeg in photoshop
3.Comparison of file size, image quality, highlight/shadow data
File Size-
At the end of the day, the JPEG image is ALOOOT smaller in file size compared to the raw image: by at least a couple thouse kb's!
Image Quality(shadows and highlights)-
If you just glance at the images above, you can immidiately see a HUGE difference in image quality between a RAW and JPEG. When i edited the jpeg, there was only so much i could do to it, for the camera had already combined the highlights in the image into 1. However, when it came to processing the raw, the possibilities seemed endless! I could edit every tone in the picture and actually replicate the beauty i saw in person! [if not make it a tad bot better] :)
At the end of the day, the JPEG image is ALOOOT smaller in file size compared to the raw image: by at least a couple thouse kb's!
Image Quality(shadows and highlights)-
If you just glance at the images above, you can immidiately see a HUGE difference in image quality between a RAW and JPEG. When i edited the jpeg, there was only so much i could do to it, for the camera had already combined the highlights in the image into 1. However, when it came to processing the raw, the possibilities seemed endless! I could edit every tone in the picture and actually replicate the beauty i saw in person! [if not make it a tad bot better] :)
4.My observations
While interacting with the Jpeg and raw photography settings, i believe that a raw allows for a more pure image before and a highly editable image after processing. With raw photos, you control your picture, not the software deciding what 'looks better'. During processing, i literally control every pixel and edit it the way i feel looks best. When finished, you can see every tone, highlight, and shadow down to the pixel level! I was truly amazed by these results of raw. The main down fall, however, is the obvious file size difference, but i believe that is only a small price to pay for an image of that great of quality.
What is a RAW image?
Why Shoot RAW photos?
Read more: http://digital-photography-school.com/raw-vs-jpeg#ixzz2e301uA58
- Contains minimally processed data from the image sensor (of a digital camera, image scanner, or motion picture film scanner.
- Are not yet processed-Not ready for print with a graphic processor
- "Pure, original" image- does not compress or automatically edit the image
Why Shoot RAW photos?
- -Not as sharp as JPEG
- -lower contrast levels (looks slightly 'washed out')
- -Able to display highlights and shadows (helpful when editing layers and shadows)
- -Have not had White balance set.
- -Can edit original image
- -Has to be processed before it can be processed, printed. or edited.
Read more: http://digital-photography-school.com/raw-vs-jpeg#ixzz2e301uA58
Me
Alliyah Brown
Sophmore
photography 2 student
By month
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
Categories
All
Black And White
Lighting Practice
Photo Hunting
Review.
Types Of Photography And Terms
RSS Feed